What was the point of the research?
The point of the research was to figure out if
transformational leadership can take place in long distant relationships where
face-to-face occurrences might not be as feasible of an option.
What were the hypotheses?
The hypothesis in the first study was that transformational
leadership communication style will have a positive relationship with job
satisfaction and interpersonal justice.
They hypothesized in the second experiment that emails
containing charisma or intellectually stimulating messages would cause higher
levels of motivation and increased performance.
What was the research method used?
The research method used in the first study was to use a
vignette approach and to split up what participants were exposed with into
three different categories: transformational leadership,
management-by-exception, and laissez-faire.
The research method of the second group was to split people
up into receiving a charismatic email, an intellectual stimulation email, a
neutral email, or a transformational email (containing both elements of
charisma and intellectual stimulation.
Were the results supportive of the research goals?
The results of the first study were supportive of the
hypotheses first predicted.
The results showed that charismatic emails improved
individual performance but had no effect on motivation. Intellectual
stimulation emails improved both individual performance and individual
motivation. As far as group performance goes, both charismatic and intellectual
stimulating emails improved performance.
Of what value was the research?
Transformational leadership can occur in long distant
relationships with employees, subordinates, peers, etc. Research shows that
people can pick up on different leadership styles in emails. In order to get
the best of all worlds, including motivation, performance, and job
satisfaction, transformational leadership styles should be used in all aspects
whether it be face to face, emails, or other forms of communication.
Bibliography
Remote transformational leadership. (2002). Leadership
and Organization Development Journal, 163-171.
No comments:
Post a Comment